Category Archives: Employees

B.A.K.E. your employees for better annual review results

In the previous post I talked about the need I had for a more consistent form of employee evaluation and feedback.

What I needed was something quick, direct, clear and actionable.

The B.A.K.E. Method

What I came up with was a simple table, on a single piece of paper called the B.A.K.E. Sheet, that captures short written elements for each of 4 areas:

  • Behaviors
  • Attitudes
  • Knowledge
  • Execution

Behavior

This is what I (or other employees) observe you doing. These are the actions and interactions of your work. Your words, actions, gestures, and the overall way you conduct yourself in the workplace (or outside it – thank you social media).

Attitudes

These are the mental patterns, thinking, bias’s and mindset that drive behavior, speech and motivation.

Knowledge

This is the expertise of the employee, what they know. It is the skills and training they have or need to get the job done.

Execution

This is how they apply all of the Behaviors, Attitudes and Knowledge coupled with processes and procedures/tools to get the assigned task or job done.

The B.A.K.E. table has 2 columns, one is “Observations” and one is “Desired/Comments”.

How to B.A.K.E. an employee

Every few weeks you sit down with the employee and summarize what you have observed and what needs to be changed improved or doubled down on using the B.A.K.E. sheet. By doing this you have the feedback loop as part of a regular interaction with employees. Necessary changes are discussed more. Incremental improvements can be recognized and rewarded where appropriate. Other circumstances can be responded to as required.

The point is that the discussion occurs on a regular basis. What you end up with is a more engaged workforce and one that has more regular improvements. Regular touch-points also foster a more continual dialog about culture and values that drive the desired outcomes in the 4 B.A.K.E. areas. Its like AGILE for feedback management.

After doing the B.A.K.E. method for a year, the annual review becomes more of a formality. But one that has fewer surprises and more concrete milestones to review, and like a good cake will taste better after its thoroughly baked.

 

What does an oven have to do with better employee reviews?

It seems its a continual struggle to consistently get and give good actionable feedback to employees.

Annual Review Surprise?

I hate annual reviews where the employee seems surprised by the revelation of some undesirable behavior or action that hasn’t been as clearly discussed as needed along the way. Especially if that employee is me.

Effective employee feedback in 2 forms

Effective managers give feedback at the point of need, whether good or bad, in One Minute Manager style. While this is good, and immediate, there needs to be a more concrete long term environment where change and improvement can be discussed, planned, encouraged and agreed to, regularly. This promotes  change in smaller increments. The discussion gets easier when it’s regular and part of the culture. It builds relationship. Feedback, in the absence of relationship, especially critical feedback, usually yields defensiveness. However, feedback in the presence of relationship, while still difficult sometimes, is more trusted and more likely to be acted upon. So the question is how do you do that type of feedback?

But do you have the right tools?

The times I have worked for large corporations they always had what I called “Performance Review DeJour” where online tools or documents were available to help the feedback process. And these were changed very regularly. However, being at a small company, or being a small business owner, can mean you don’t have access to these formal tools or methods.

So what is needed is a simple form that allows for the easy and regular capture of simple elements of feedback to the employee. Something that could be done on one sheet of paper (or screen). Something that would only take a few minutes but provide clarity and actionable discussion points.

In the next post I will share what I came up with, that is how you can B.A.K.E an employee to better results.

How emotional immaturity is like a clogged toilet and what you can do about it

There are few thing more unpleasant to deal with than unclogging a toilet. Over the years I have heard those famous and dreaded words several times, “Dad, the toilet is clogged, again”. I am not sure who decided it was Dad’s problem when the toilet clogged but I would like a re-count.

Thankfully, most of the time the remedy is quick and the problem is literally flushed away in a few moments. Sometimes, however, the problem is more serious, messy and in need of professional assistance.

The last time this happened, while I was correcting the clog, it occurred to me that this is exactly what happens in teams of people where emotional maturity is lacking in one or more of the team members.

Emotional immaturity creates situations where things that should be flushed away quickly hang around and clog up other normal interactions and operations. And, like a clogged toilet, if they hang around too long things get ugly and very unpleasant fast. And everyone notices.

I have found that in order to best deal with these situations you have to act quickly as a manager or leader. The longer the situations are left hanging in the air the more team chemistry can be damaged.

So what can you do about an emotionally immature situation?

I have found that a quick, low key dialog as close to the point of the issue or incident is best. Think Ken Blanchard’s One Minute Manager. Try to be calm and focused, directly pointing out the observed issue, and desired action. Before you engage with the person, mentally rehearse what and how you need to say and try to anticipate their responses. If I am calm and low key in my approach I have found that the employee or colleague is more receptive. In most cases employees respond well and the issue is ‘flushed away’ and things are better. Most employees want to improve and when presented with actionable opportunities they will work to improve.

But what do you do when emotional issues  don’t change?

Some people lack the emotional maturity to handle basic relational situations like clear, open or honest communication, confrontation, conflict, compromise, or forgiveness. In other words, they missed the day in Kindergarten when getting along with others was taught. Others  remain emotionally opaque and can’t have meaningful relationships while some are just plain mean, devious and vengeful. These are the kind of people that can really ‘clog up’ your team and company.

In cases where someone is in that situation they have to learn and choose to make different choices, let go of anger, forgive, adapt, grow and become more open. It’s not easy. That person has to have a recognition that there is a problem and a willingness to make changes. Some folks can do that, others choose not to. And here, sometimes a professional is needed.

It’s not me it’s YOU

At one point in my career, there was a team member who basically operated with the attitude that if you ever did them wrong (actual or perceived) you were written off and nothing would change that. That person chose to remain full of anger and resentment toward their perceived injustices which led to deep seated bitterness. Their actions and attitudes created a negative atmosphere and affected team productivity and cohesion. Coaching, closed door meetings or pleadings could not change their anger or resentment toward the situation or the other team members.  And, in that case, it only got better when that person was no longer with the company. In this case, I was a victim of the sunk cost fallacy. I had already invested a lot of time and effort in trying to improve the situation so I didn’t take the necessary action when I should have. The delay hurt the team, the individual involved and me.

Necessary Changes

As a manager or leader in this situation you have to decide how critical the issue is, how disruptive it is to the team and how that on-going situation affects the department or company. You have to decide if the contribution of that employee is worth the disruption. Most of the time it is not. When your threshold is crossed and other forms of redress with the employee have not worked, you have to act in removing that troubling employee, either by re-assignment, moving to another department or division or firing them altogether. Dr. Henry Cloud, in his book “Necessary Endings” lays out clear guidelines and methods for these situations. I highly recommend it.

On a team that is operating at a high level, one bad apple can affect the whole lot. It is better to deal with issues while they are still small than to wait until the mess is really bad and stinky later.

Now, where is that plunger????